Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert_Paulson2
Hard to sort out the facts from the horsehockey in this article.

King Khalid Military City, built in the 80s, was US Designed, Supervised by the Corps of Engineers, etc. Hardly a secret.

Most air bases and radar sites were also US designed and built.

Squadrons and Squadrons of Saudi piloted planes threaten only sand dunes and anything in the glide path.

Because royals get first crack at being pilots, they have the largest cadre of totally untrainable pilots.These guys are in it for the uniform and rank. They refuse to be stationed anywhere other than the three large cities.

If they got Chinese missles, then they had to get the Chinese technicians and rocketeers because they could never launch with total Saudi control.

The whole article sounds like somebody couldn't get their shortwave working tonight and posted the script here instead.

14 posted on 04/09/2002 8:06:22 PM PDT by leadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: leadhead; Tennessee Bob
Squadrons and Squadrons of Saudi piloted planes threaten only sand dunes and anything in the glide path.

Because royals get first crack at being pilots, they have the largest cadre of totally untrainable pilots.

I'm trying hard to regret the waste of beautiful aircraft, but am somehow LMAO.

After all, their checks did clear.

20 posted on 04/09/2002 8:34:26 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: leadhead
After 15 years in Saudi Arabia as a contractor training their air force, I'm inclined to agree with you. RSAF has been referred to (not without justification) as the most exclusive flying club in the world.

The likelihood of their gaining the expertise to operate such a complex in that short a period of time is, to put it charitabley, remote.BTW, I've been in KKMC on more than a few occasions and saw nothing like the article discribs. I am encouraged to see that they (supposedly) have Tornadoes guarding the place. Probably one of the few aircraft in the world the requires 3 hours of maintainence for every hour of operation.

25 posted on 04/09/2002 9:18:10 PM PDT by Adrastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: leadhead
There is some misleading stuff floating around on this thread. Leadhead has the right idea. Sorry, cant say any more.

Michael C.

33 posted on 04/09/2002 9:48:08 PM PDT by mcollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson