Posted on 04/08/2002 4:23:46 PM PDT by Sungirl
I wouldn't rescue the seeing eye dog of anyone either, because they can be replaced, tragic as the loss would be, they are likely covered by insurance against accidental death. At least, if I had to have one I would insure it.
Faulty premise and logical fallacy.
All industries have one motive : profit.
Thanks for playing.
Shucks! We'uns eats us squirrels an' lizards avary' day. What you'uns talkin about, not gotten no "suber-stance"? Aint you ever eatin' some good ci'yote raw and nice like? Mmm, fanger-lickin good! Specially when 'ay's a still squirmin', heh-heh! Crow, it be the most bestest of all of 'em, stomp on 'ar heads good some when you catch 'em. I's makes crow sandwiches, 'ays good!
Joking aside, whoever thinks waterfowl don't provide food is an idiot- or lying, as in this case. And coyotes and crows never require population control? These people aren't even very good liers!
Yes, let's!
Gen 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.Mat 15:36-37 And he took the seven loaves and the fishes, and gave thanks, and brake [them], and gave to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude. And they did all eat, and were filled: and they took up of the broken [meat] that was left seven baskets full.
1Cr 8:8 But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse.
Col 2:16-17 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body [is] of Christ.
Rom 14:2-3 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
Act 10:11-15 And [in a trance, Peter] saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean. And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
John sees the same vision in the next chapter.
God emphatically states that he never wanted animal sacrifices.
...for reasons having nothing to do with sustinence. Eating meat for nourishment is axiomatic in Scripture.
BTW: There's about a hundred verses ordering animal sacrifices.
To be sure, we are not to condemn those who, for whatever reason, do not eat meat...and those who do not are not to condemn those who do. Nobody here has a problem with you not eating meat; we have a problem with you condemning us for doing so.
Scopes, yes. "Laser scopes", no.
No they'll just sue the Fish and Wildlife service like PETA is doing.
Awesome, but my wife says the yearling does are the tastiest.
No tree squirrels (yet), there wuld not be enough left after I shot them with what I have. Also, my JRT's enjoy conversing with them, begging them to come down and play [ :-) ],However, I have shot, plowed over, disced up and poisoned numerous ground squirrels, they dig holes that my horses can step into and break a leg.
Crows? Only when they are too numerous, and attempt to feed on my neighbor's freshly delivered lamb's eyes or umbilicus, or other bad habits they may get into, otherwise, they don't look like they would taste good. Although, my freind says they taste like somewhat between a spotted owl and a california sea gull....
The point is, the article attempts to refute hunting per se, and attempts to bolster the argument with his statements, which have no basis in fact, and simply can not be made with a straight face by anyone with any sense.
Picking a particular "cutesy" animal as evidence of "bad hunters" does you or your agrumentative skills no justice. Indeed, most hunters probably have a favorite game, and probably quite a few have some game they would rather not engage.
Does the author, or do you, have the moral authority to place judgement on another's actions for wanting to circumvent the supermarket to place food on their table, or perhaps ease the pain and suffering of a herd by thinning it out, or perhaps simply ridding their yard of dangerous vermin?
Would you complain if your neighborhood were being overrun by great big sewer rats, and a kindly neighbor offerred to off the ones seen in your yard with a shotgun or a .22?
I am sure your fertile mind can come up with numerous other examples where it would be "OK" to pull the trigger on an animal.
Did you regret being out there that day, not having a shot? I bet you didn't, hard to explain why sometimes we watch them, isn't it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.