Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush decisions rankle conservatives
Washington Times ^ | 3/27/02 | Donald Lambro

Posted on 03/27/2002 1:09:35 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:52:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: TLBSHOW
yes you use his base to attack him from the inside,and guess what it works. I want to know where anti-bushies will stand when they run a Kerry or a Edwards against Bush?
41 posted on 03/28/2002 4:40:25 PM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion; Congressman Billybob
People calm down, they get new information, and often re-evaluate their previous position based on that new information.

As more details emerge, it looks as if there is going to be neutrality from Ashcroft and Olson on a lot of this stuff. The heavy lifting on the defense will be done by the Common Cause crowd. And there are about two dozen court decisions that make the ultimate result of the expedited handling of the case pretty easy to guess.

Congressman Billybob has a lot of expertise on this issue, and listening to his discussion of this matter leads me to believe that Bush decided to kill this issue PERMANENTLY. The only way to do that, though was for this bill to become law. SCOTUS cannot give advisory opinions.

Quite frankly, I can see the logic. I'd have preferred a veto, but things look like they will work out even better. What's left of this law will benefit our side, and the Dems will be toast.

42 posted on 03/28/2002 5:14:49 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: hchutch

President slams McCain and CFR/WP Slams Bush and the Right Wingers

McCain-Feingold Follies

Who says he's a sore loser? Who says he just couldn't give John McCain his moment in the Rose Garden, a ceremonial signing of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill? Who says he would rather look petty than go through the gripping and grinning and pen-handling that a White House ceremony entails?

Who? Just about everybody, after George Bush dashed off his signature between bouts on Iraq with Condoleezza Rice and the vice president. Then he dashed off to raise funds.

McCain got a call at 7 a.m. at his Arizona home from a junior White House aide whose name he didn't know, telling him the bill had been signed. Later, a White House emissary brought to his office a commemorative pen and a note of congratulation. McCain issued a statement striking for its terseness: "I'm pleased that President Bush has signed campaign reform legislation into law."

Perhaps Bush was playing, as he so often does, to his right wing, which hates McCain, foams at his bill and deplores his lack of deference to Bush. They attribute McCain's insubordination to the fact that he "never got over South Carolina" -- the state where Bush effectively ended McCain's White House hopes.

The right wing is not moved by the sight of magnanimity and bipartisanship. Right-wingers thought Bush was right to call the bill "flawed" the day it passed the Senate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28653-2002Mar27.html

43 posted on 03/28/2002 5:20:17 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
As I said, this is looking more like a well-crafted plan to quietly grease the skids for McConnell's legal team and the NRA.
44 posted on 03/28/2002 5:36:01 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
With "conservatives" like Elizabeth Dole running for office, the rats don't need a plan.
45 posted on 03/29/2002 1:53:25 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: snopercod, Boucheau, log_cabin_gop_boy
Thanks for the ping, John. And for the, as usual, spot-on commentary.

Bush has not only failed to defend our beleaguered Constitution. He has added to the already backbreaking list of unconstitutional legislation that has (sometimes surreptitiously, sometime flagrantly) forced its way into our daily lives.

Bush's philosophy of reaching out stinks.

Reaching out (especially to the left) in America 2001 almost always results in one thing: capitulation to those who hold the Constitution in about as high regard as they do their morning newspaper (if that). And if uniting America (Bush's apparent domestic theme) is defined as capitulating to special interest groups, or surrendering more of our Constitutional liberties (especially the freedom of personal choice, as opposed to obedience to unconstitutional government dictates), then there is something to be said for divisiveness. Unity, at the sacrifice of liberty (as embodied in Constitutional tenets) provides a fleeting sense of communal well-being, at best. Our founders were not concerned with our sense of well-being as defined by our ability to afford prescription drugs, or buy steel-based products at a certain government-prescribed price. They were concerned with our sense of well-being as defined by our ability to make our own decisions, and enjoy the fruits of our own labors.

Unfortunately, revisionist historians, and modern-day brainwashers philosophers/pundits have taught us to believe that our well-being (pursuit of happiness?) is based on physical/temporal things, rather than timeless, priceless, intangible, God-given possessions (life, liberty). And we have (unfortunately) learned their (perverted) lessons well. And with each new, 'well-intentioned' legislative attempt to make life a little more physically comfortable for us all, the Constitution (the most brilliant blueprint for governance ever conceived by the mind of man) is one step closer to residing in the dustbin of history.

Once again, the American form of government has been betrayed....snopercod

46 posted on 03/30/2002 1:54:42 PM PST by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson