I have searched the California Constitution on various keywords, as well as manually perusing the provisions within, and I am unable to find a single phrase that supports this argument. Does anyone know what the hell this guy is talking about? Are you ready? Do you remember when Californians passed a constitutional amendment protecting "Privacy"?
That was it. A right to unlimited abortion is considered to be "privacy" under this provision. Meanwhile, the State bureaucrats can sneak onto your land, take samples and photographs, fine and you without recourse, they can beat on your door and examine your kids, they can search your car without a warrant. They don't call that privacy.
Orwellian, isn't it?
Are you ready? Do you remember when Californians passed a constitutional amendment protecting "Privacy"? That was it. A right to unlimited abortion is considered to be "privacy" under this provision. Meanwhile, the State bureaucrats can sneak onto your land, take samples and photographs, fine and you without recourse, they can beat on your door and examine your kids, they can search your car without a warrant. They don't call that privacy. Orwellian, isn't it? Are you SERIOUS? Is that how it passed? I swear, we need to pass an immediate ban on using loaded words in ANY form of legislation or Constitutional amendment... Ugh!
From the California Constutition (the Communist manifesto that it is...):
Article I Declaration of Rights Section 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
And there you have it. Californians are guaranteed a "right" to terminate their children based on
two BROADLY DEFINED words. Ladies and Gentlemen, if this is the case, we are now officially in a state of Oligarchic Anarchy - where only the Lawyers truly rule, and the rest of us are mere pawns and serfs at the mercy of the legal system. If this isn't proof enough of the need to COMPLETELY remove Lawyers from the legislative process, I don't know what is.
Augh!
:( ttt