"...Bad Boys, Bad Boys. Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Bad Boys, Bad Boys, ... "
"There are two benefits of a visa bond," said Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS). "First, a bond provides a monetary incentive for the visitor to leave when his visa has expired, and second, a visa bond privatizes the entry-exit process."
Outstanding!
This would be a small but necessary step in winning not only the War on Terror, but also the War on Illegal Immigration.
An illegal have trouble getting by in the US? Why, no. All sorts oof state and local agencies don't want to hurt his feelings and will give great medical attention, especially in the maternity ward, give him reduced tuition at public colleges, allow him to get back on the streets with no license or mandatory insurance and so on. And, if proof of elegibility is required, those documents are available at very reasonable cost at a location near you. No? Today is Sunday. Try a local flea market in an area with a large Mexican population. It should be safe especially if there are lots of kids about. Shop for whatever, but watch for a booth with IDs for sale. You'll find it. Some signs will even be in English. If you need another SSA card, you probably can pick up a good looking version.
Fee for visas, my butt. Why will that do to solve the much greater problem.
--Boris
Okay, let's waste a lot of time discussing nonsense and then simply let in anyone who feels like moving with us.
There used to be an immigration law, called Simpson-Mazzoli that was supposed to punished employers for hiring illegal aliens. It was passed as the counter-weight to the huge amnesty granted during Reagan's first term. Does anyone know whether it's still enforced? I don't think it is.
To conclude, any 'amnesty' is bad, regardless whether it's accompanied by some 'tough' law addressing future immigration. History shows that our compassionate authorities are much more confortable tracking our incomes, our incorrect thoughts or our smoking habits than defending our borders.
Okay, let's waste a lot of time discussing nonsense and then simply let in anyone who feels like moving with us.
There used to be an immigration law, called Simpson-Mazzoli that was supposed to punished employers for hiring illegal aliens. It was passed as the counter-weight to the huge amnesty granted during Reagan's first term. Does anyone know whether it's still enforced? I don't think it is.
To conclude, any 'amnesty' is bad, regardless whether it's accompanied by some 'tough' law addressing future immigration. History shows that our compassionate authorities are much more confortable tracking our incomes, our incorrect thoughts or our smoking habits than defending our borders.
I disagree. The terrorists are very well funded and wouldn't hesitate to foreit a few bucks to remain here and wreak havoc. As for some bail bondsman tracking them, the terrorists can simply set up their own shop and bond their own people.
No bond agent would touch this with a ten-foot pole unless there was a provision relieving them of responsibility if the subject leaves the country. Unlike american-born fugitives from justice, foreigners have someplace else to go where they can blend right in.
A simple cash bond, forfeitable upon non-compliance would be best.