Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"MEXICAN AMNESTY UPDATE" (STRATEGY FROM PRO-ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION WEBSITE)
American-Immigration.Com Attorneys-at-Law ^ | 16 Feb. 2002 | American-Immigration.Com (Pro-Illegal Immigration)

Posted on 03/24/2002 5:56:20 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo

Mexican Amnesty Update

2002/2/16-17:44:6

The Bush administration is pushing Congress to make good on the president's promise to grant amnesty to millions of Mexican workers living and working illegally in the United States. Bush is preparing once more to take up the matter with Mexican President Vicente Fox in Monterrey, Mexico, on March 22.

James W. Ziglar, commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, for weeks has been insisting the issue is alive. 'Some believe that our migration talks with Mexico have been forgotten in the wake of September 11. I assure you that is not the case,' he told a gathering of pro-immigration organization leaders at the National Immigration Forum Conference earlier this month.

Mr. Ziglar outlined the administration's goals earlier this month at the immigration forum conference, where he said that ranking State Department and INS officials have been meeting with 'high level Mexican officials' on amnesty and related immigration issues. The 'amnesty' is more of a point based guest worker program that would provide legal status, with points being awarded for certain qualities in the applicant. Enough points would qualify a person for a visa.

Those who would be most eligible for the program would be illegal workers who have been in the country for a long time, are employed, have family connections here, have passed background checks and have no criminal record. One question is whether the visas should be temporary or permanent. President Bush wants them to be permanent, in the form of Green Cards.

Others want to see something more like the H-2 temporary work visa, renewable indefinitely. As a compormise, others suggest that Mexican workers be given renewable, temporary work permits. After six to 10 years, the workers could be made eligible for permanent residency. The administration argues that the nation needs foreign workers to farm and garden and to do the menial hotel, restaurant and hospital jobs that many American workers disdain. They say their cheap labor benefits U.S. consumers by keeping down the cost of food and services. Of course, it is also important to recognize and treat fairly the Mexican nationals who have taken up residence in our country.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 245i; amnesty; bush; fox; illegalaliens; ins; mexico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: navyblue
"He is looking to provide business with an unlimited source of cheap labor and the American public can be damned"

And how long will it be 'cheap labor' if the left has anything to say about it, and mark my words they will? The 'cheap labor' will be just another cudgel in the hands of the left to create more agitation in this country.

21 posted on 03/24/2002 9:11:21 AM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: navyblue;healey22;lutine;Right_Makes_Might;wku man;sonofliberty2;sweetliberty;kattracks;sarcasm...
"In my newspaper yesterday, the article read that Bush said that we must give special privileges to Mexicans due to our special relationship"

The only "special relationship" that exists between the U.S. and that third-world dump to the south is similar to the relationship a fat malignant tumor has with whatever it's attached to.

23 posted on 03/24/2002 9:20:31 AM PST by Tancredo Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
Let me ask you, do the majority of the immigrants come here legal or not?

Heck no, I am talking about the "old-time" immigrants that came here 20 or more years ago. I don't know the stats but I would be surprised if more than 10% were here legally. I don't count the "got-legal-after-amnesty" folks as being here legally.

And I completely agree about the rest of your post. Even in Lancaster County, PA we are being overrun. There are parts of Lancaster city that look as bad as anything you will see in the Third World.

24 posted on 03/24/2002 9:21:39 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
Hey all you Pubbies out there!

If you do not agree with what Bush is doing on the immigration problem, make a note to yourself!

Tomorrow morning send off an e-mail or phone call to your state and national Republican committee and tell them if Bush does not lose his love affair with Mexico and start putting America and Americans first (not just business interests) that you will leave the Republican Party!

If he gets enough flak from his own party he may start listening to them and dump Karl Rove.

Remember! It's the squeaky wheel that gets the grease!

25 posted on 03/24/2002 9:24:29 AM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
Their analytical work in the White House have brought them to two conclusions.

1) They have 'run the numbers' and looked at past RINO sellouts, and believe that in taking up the mantle of gradual regularization and legitimization of illegal aliens, they will gain access to Hispanic votes in 2004 and be assured of reelection;

and

2), they have concluded they would take a short term 'hit' from this from GOP conservatives in forums and on talk shows and at the grassroots and in Congress, but that after time all would settle down and the peristalsyic prospect of "President Hillary" or "President Gore" with no true conservative third party vote would be enough to keep them also in the 2004 column.

So they have taken the risk.

This is Karl Rove and others thinking and Bush carrying it out with full knowledge and forethought. Don't let anyone tell you that this is not happening. The real victim is the Republican who supported Bush and wants to support him again. It is very sad, pathetic and irritating to, as an American who believes in the rule of law and national security, be essentially taken for granted and treated in this rather shoddy way.

26 posted on 03/24/2002 9:25:26 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: AmericanInTokyo
No, the point is that just as there are RINOs, there LINOFDs, Libertarians In Name Only For Democrats
29 posted on 03/24/2002 9:45:42 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: AmericanInTokyo
Libertarian Party Platform

Libertarian Party Platform - IMMIGRATION Libertarian Party Platform

 

 

IMMIGRATION

We hold that human rights should not be denied or abridged on the basis of nationality. We condemn massive roundups of Hispanic Americans and others by the federal government in its hunt for individuals not possessing required government documents. We strongly oppose all measures that punish employers who hire undocumented workers. Such measures repress free enterprise, harass workers, and systematically discourage employers from hiring Hispanics.

We welcome all refugees to our country and condemn the efforts of U.S. officials to create a new "Berlin Wall" which would keep them captive. We condemn the U.S. government's policy of barring those refugees from our country and preventing Americans from assisting their passage to help them escape tyranny or improve their economic prospects.

Undocumented non-citizens should not be denied the fundamental freedom to labor and to move about unmolested. Furthermore, immigration must not be restricted for reasons of race, religion, political creed, age, or sexual preference.

We therefore call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country illegally. We oppose government welfare and resettlement payments to non-citizens just as we oppose government welfare payments to all other persons.



LP HOME | PREVIOUS PLANK | NEXT PLANK | TABLE OF CONTENTS

31 posted on 03/24/2002 9:48:34 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: AmericanInTokyo
When was the last time "our" federal government gave native-born Americans "amnesty" on tax liens?

"Our" government treats us like shit. When we are innocently caught up in IRS snafus - like my elderly native-born American mother was - it threatens us with criminal prosecution for "back taxes" it later admitted she never owed.

No wonder Jorge Bush is almost as widely disrespected among social conservatives as among liberals.

IMMIGRATION resource library: public-health facts, court decisions, local INS numbers!

33 posted on 03/24/2002 9:59:10 AM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Slapping the face of 280 million Americans who have no voice in this issue, nor have they been consulted by their "elected" officials as to how they feel about allowing millions of law breakers into their country.

Congress is hearing from the public, and our president is urging Congress to hurry and pass 245i though the public is outraged.

What is the real reason for passage of 245i when the public is clearly against it? Why would our elected officials run against the will of the people on an issue like this?

With the passage of 245i, and if Bush gets all that he wants, he promises the free flow of goods and serivces, and people. Do we really want the free flow of people over our borders?

34 posted on 03/24/2002 10:01:40 AM PST by antidemocommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
Is it possible that we would have had some type of war even if 9/11 had not taken place in ordre to boost GW's poll numbers so that he could move of his New World Order agenda, following the path his dad had taken?
35 posted on 03/24/2002 10:04:22 AM PST by antidemocommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PRS
Here in California the Libertarian Party opposed Proposition 187.
36 posted on 03/24/2002 10:05:07 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: Don Myers
I believe that special relationship exists between the Bushes and Mexico, not between Mexico and the US. 11 posted on 3/24/02 9:29 AM Pacific by Don Myers

Yes, I can see that. Good point.

38 posted on 03/24/2002 10:06:31 AM PST by antidemocommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: dax zenos
Open borders advocates consider mobs of illegal aliens looting Los Angeles acceptable collateral damage.
40 posted on 03/24/2002 10:27:32 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson