Replies

I always suspected you prefer cash rather than the Constitution.

I prefer that people I support WIN. The Constitutionality of this is yet to be determined.

Lots of people on this site supported the line item veto, which was also clearly unconstitutional, and was ruled as such, even though lots of Republicans voted for it.

No one promoted the line-item veto more than Ronald Reagan.

The line item veto requires a Constitutional amendment. Everyone but you knows this. Once the provision is added via amendment, it is constitutional. You really need to find a new hobby, son. Politics is not your forte, you don't understand the system of government created in the Constitution and you think that a politician is a leader.

People like you have made it possible for the political class to destroy this country with your mindless, sports fan enthusiasm for the putrid political games these moral retardates play. If you and your kind would stick to team sports as an outlet for your urge to worship other humans we might have a chance to preserve and reestablish the design for liberty contained in the system of government established by the framers of our Constitution.

Partisan pompom shaking is shirking the duties of citizenship at best and at worst it's treason. You and your fellow celebrity worshippers had better wake up.

To: Willie Green
I prefer that people I support WIN. The Constitutionality of this is yet to be determined.

Lots of people on this site supported the line item veto, which was also clearly unconstitutional, and was ruled as such, even though lots of Republicans voted for it.

No one promoted the line-item veto more than Ronald Reagan.
# 95 by sinkspur
****************************

No, sinkspur, the bill IS un-Constitutional.
I don't have to wait on the Supreme Court to know that.

And, going beyond the Constitution,
the bill also violates our right to free speech.

I also am in favor of a line-item veto,
and I fully support a Constitutional Amendment to make it legal.