Skip to comments.
Statement by the President: "... I will sign (CFR) into law."
Office of the Press Secretary ^
| March 20, 2002
| George W. Bush
Posted on 03/20/2002 4:33:41 PM PST by erk
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 20, 2002
Statement by the President
Like many Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, I support common-sense reforms to end abuses in our campaign finance system. The reforms passed today, while flawed in some areas, still improve the current system overall, and I will sign them into law.
The legislation makes some important progress on the timeliness of disclosure, individual contribution limits, and banning soft money from corporations and labor unions, but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions. I continue to believe the best reform is full and timely disclosure of campaign contributions.
###
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020320-21.html
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; cfr; cfrlist; silenceamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 581 next last
To: godisright
What about all the congressmen who voted for it? I figure the ones who voted for it know they can find loopholes in the law as written.
Let me play devil's advocate for a moment. I admit not having read the finer points of the bill. Is it possible that we're overreacting? There are other things we can't do on television, but few people call those things unconstitutional. I ask this question in all seriousness, maybe this thread could use a cogent explanation of exactly what part(s) of the bill violate the first amendment. I'll probably end up agreeing with you, but I just want to understand this issue before running my mouth off.
To: Eagle Eye
I was only off by one amendment.Maybe they're starting with the 1st amendment and going down the list.
To: erk
Time to leave. Any of you who are upset by this and want to bail out of what seems to be becoming the Republicrat party, check out
www.constitutionparty.com. Seriously.
To: Congressman Billybob
Yes, the Constitution deserves to be defended. I'll be praying for you guys to prevail. God save the Republic.
64
posted on
03/20/2002 5:03:56 PM PST
by
dittomom
To: erk
Trust this takes the sting out of the inevitable.
65
posted on
03/20/2002 5:04:09 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: VRWC_minion
I hope you are right but if he has a whole boatload of options, as you say, WHY would he issue a statement and put it on the White House website, saying that he WILL sign it?
66
posted on
03/20/2002 5:04:16 PM PST
by
Lorena
To: LiberteeBell
Maybe they're starting with the 1st amendment and going down the list. Most assuredly.
To: cactmh
I'm betting Pat Buchanan wouldn't have been making Mexican immigration gift trip! Its time to seriously look outside of the 2 birds of the same dirty feather!
To: erk
Buh-bye bush. Too bad so sad.
This, along with your blanket amnesty proposal for illegals (yeah, award them legal status for breaking the law), I am through with you. You are just like any other politicians after all.
69
posted on
03/20/2002 5:05:08 PM PST
by
Chong
To: Ken H
Someone is giving the President some very bad advice on many dometic issues, IMO.
I believe his name is Karl Rove
He is the one who was behind the tariff fiasco.
70
posted on
03/20/2002 5:05:26 PM PST
by
WOSG
To: mwl1
"Does anyone have a sense of how quickly the US Supremes will hear this case?"
Yeah, right after the overturn the Brady Bill.
To: godisright
That one sentence is the EPITOME of political fence riding. I think the one where he used "Excess" and "already been killed" to describe the embryos turned "stem cell lines" has it beat hands down.
72
posted on
03/20/2002 5:06:01 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: Congressman Billybob
You hinted yesterday of a plan after it was signed by the Senate.,.,.,what has changed your mind?
73
posted on
03/20/2002 5:06:20 PM PST
by
estrogen
To: Congressman Billybob
You hinted yesterday of a plan after it was signed by the Senate.,.,.,what has changed your mind?
74
posted on
03/20/2002 5:06:22 PM PST
by
estrogen
To: erk
Well there you go. Anyone who thought George Bush was a man of principle better think again. He's a political opportunist and will do whatever it takes to stay in office.
75
posted on
03/20/2002 5:06:40 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: mlo
I might agree, but this isn't simply about politics. It's about TRUST. We trusted the word of a man we all believed in. This was his word...."I will sign no campaign Finance Reform Bill that does not contain......." It doesn't contain the specifics Bush demanded. He signs it, he loses the trust of soooo many, and gives the libs a chance to shoot to kill. This is sad.
76
posted on
03/20/2002 5:06:41 PM PST
by
Nix 2
To: Ken H
Someone is giving the President some very bad advice on many dometic issues, IMO. megga dittos !!
I thought he would take the PRINCIPLED stand for Free Speech... instead it seems he is USING the SCOTUS to do his dirty work.... very disapointing...
David
To: erk
It seems like so many of the posters here are against CFR because of the concept that soft money contributions are a form of free speech under the constitution.
Am I missing some other reasons most people here are against this? I'm sort of up in the air at the moment, and trying to determine what I think.
78
posted on
03/20/2002 5:07:05 PM PST
by
jurisdog
To: sinkspur
In terms of hard money, the GOP will make out like bandits with this bill.I always suspected you prefer cash rather than the Constitution.
To: VRWC_minion
Whenever we speculate how Bush is going to let us down we are normally happy with the final outcome. Bush hasn't played his cards yet. Let us wait to see how he handles it. He has a whole boat load of options yet.In case you didn't notice, this statement came from the Office of the Press Secretary. I've stated numerous times, as recently as earlier today, that I believed the President would veto this.
I was wrong. I don't see how there will be a happy outcome to this based on today's statement. Bush's only card to play is a VETO. There wouldn't be enough votes to overturn that.
He signs, he loses - BIGTIME.
80
posted on
03/20/2002 5:07:52 PM PST
by
mombonn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 581 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson