Replies

The only problem with my idea is that the appointments are only good for 2 years (according to Rush Limbaugh). However, it would give the repubs a chance to get back the Senate - which would allow them to make the confirmations permanent. I still think it's a great idea.

Yes, a gubernatorial appointment to the U.S. Senate is good for no more than two years, usually less, depending on when the vacancy occurs. In TX such an appointment is good for only six months, nonrenewable. There must be a special election within six months in TX to fill a vacant Senate seat. This last occured in 1993, when Kay Bailey Hutchison was chosen as the ultimate successor to "Lord" Bentsen, who became bILLclinton's secretary of the treasury. And this occurred in 1961, when John Tower became senator to a 5.5-year term to succeed ultimately Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson. But in GA and most states, an appointment would be good for up to two years. I think WA also requires early special elections, as was held in 1983, when Henry M. Jackson died in office.

Yes, the recess appointees are only good until the Congress reconvenes after the next general election. Then they'd have to be put up again, or vacate, is how I read that article in the Constitution.

No, really, it's a good idea.