[Shethink13]

The baby seizes the mother and uses her as a life support system. When the government prohibits her from stopping this seizure, it becomes a constitutional issue. The government, if it does this, is a party to the seizure. That's unconstitutional.

Sorry, but you are one screwed up dude! You are talking as if there are some evil fetuses floating around in the universe ready to pounce on some innocent woman in order to usurp her uterus for it's own development, for crying out loud.

There's only ONE way for a woman to have a "parasite" sucking her resources dry, and 99.99% of the time it is by her OWN ACTIONS AND CHOICE that this comes about. The INNOCENT unborn human being had absolutely no choice in the matter.

[H.Akston]

Sorry, but you are one screwed up dude! You are talking as if there are some evil fetuses floating around in the universe ready to pounce on some innocent woman in order to usurp her uterus for it's own development, for crying out loud.

The INNOCENT unborn human being had absolutely no choice in the matter"

You see, my dear, it's not that innocent. And you're talking as if I'm talking as if there are some evil fetuses floating around out there.

This "innocent" fetus NEEDS another life for a while. It's not that innocent. You would like to think I'm a screwed up dude, but you can not escape my reasoning. Those who try to do so invariably turn hysterical, and lash out at my character, not my reasoning.

"Need" is the claim that many liberals/looters use to justify redistribution of property.