Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear
It may currently be true that the definition of person varies based on the context

There is a large--and not entirely consistent-- body of law over when a corporation is a "person" under the Constitution and when it isn't.

290 posted on 03/19/2002 1:30:41 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
"over when a corporation is a "person"

Likewise, I understand that some old buildings are registered as "persons" in order to protect them from the wrecking ball.

This only makes my case stronger: if corporations cannot be ended (killed?) willy-nilly, nor historical buildings, then similar protections should be afforded actual human beings.

It would actually be instructive (and helpful if what you say is true regarding the current ambiguity of corporate law) to have all entities that can be declared "persons" described in one law. If this so offends people (i.e. associating humans with victorian houses and Enron) then maybe we might start to clarify things in these areas as well.

291 posted on 03/20/2002 9:29:59 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson