Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: H.Akston
And I disagree emphatically. Your definition of "independent" life is exactly that, your opinion. My definition of "independent" life is a a unique human genome combined with a unique human being. My definition is supportable, yours is arbitrary and capricious.

What is the responsibility of the federal government if the state of Oregon declares all citizens over the age of 70, who are unable to sustain themselves without assistance, be euthanized?

181 posted on 03/16/2002 5:22:54 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
And I disagree emphatically. Your definition of "independent" life is exactly that, your opinion. My definition of "independent" life is a a unique human genome combined with a unique human being. My definition is supportable, yours is arbitrary and capricious.

Your definition of an independent life dodges the issue - does that genome have a right to suckle sustenance from another's body, while inside it? You would call that independent? That seems arbitrary and capricious to me.

The State it can't force a woman to incubate that life with her own body, and not violate both her right to be secure in her own person, and her right to not provide servitude to another life. (much less succumb to a rapist's dominance)

184 posted on 03/16/2002 7:15:58 AM PST by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson