Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeAChooser
But what about his NOT upholding campaign finance, bribery, blackmail, privacy and election laws (where democRATS are concerned)? What about his not upholding the laws against murder and mass murder (just because democRATS may have committed those crimes)? What about his not upholding the laws regarding national security and treason (which democRATS appear to have broken)?

I'm not sure what you're getting out. The President is not the leader of the judicial branch. He can't just declare the Clintonoids "guilty" and have them locked up like a South American dictator.

869 posted on 03/14/2002 2:30:24 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
I'm not sure what you're getting out. The President is not the leader of the judicial branch. He can't just declare the Clintonoids "guilty" and have them locked up like a South American dictator.

Of course not, but surely you don't think that if Bush says "investigate", Ashcroft won't ... AND vice versa. Ultimately, the ONLY person now keeping the crimes committed those 8 dark years by the democRATS from being properly investigated is Bush. All I want is a PROPER investigation and all I hear the defenders of Bush and other "move-on"ers doing now is SPINNING ... just like Clinton's defender's did.

870 posted on 03/14/2002 2:41:15 PM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson