I'll put it into small words for you.
By not supp-ort-ing the pubs and mak-ing your rea-sons for non supp-ort known you are act-ual-ly imp-rov-ing your chan-ces of get-ting your con-serv-at-ive i-de-as put in-to act-ion.
As it stands now the difference between pubs and rats is so small that voting for either is a vote for the other. And by stating that gore for four is better than the other four for 16 I'm actually making my point even more clear.
Look, after 4 years of clowntoon who did the pubs put up? Dole. Did anyone ever think he had a chance of winning? I didn't. Then after 8 years of clowntoon the pubs put someone up that actually seemed to be a true conservative and he won. Why? Because they regrouped and came up with someone that they thought we would take as a "true" conservative. How many more times before we get a "true" conservative is up to you and I voicing our opinion at the ballot box.
EBUCK
Did you or did you not state that "it is better Gore for four"? Did you or did you not intimate earlier that the Homeland Defense agency in the hands of Hillary would be a nightmare? No you were caught in a logical fallacy and now are trying to find a corner in a round room. To use an old Vietnam saying, you are advocating that we "destroy the village in order to save it".