Replies

It seems to me that this report is required by law, every 6 years or so. If it is codified in a law, then the law also states to which committee(s) this report must be submitted.

It also will indicate the security clearance attached to the report.

If you know the committee, you can then narrow down the list of suspects.

I keep waiting for someone to mention Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers. I don't see what the damn fuss is about, didn't everyone know we have nuclear contingency plans from way back. This just seems to be a modification of what we have always done. The real stinker was the headlines and the interpretation,,that we were on the verge of nuking someone. The entire thing is a tempest in a teapot and didn't threaten anyone's life. It is disiinformation and makes the Dems look bad and gives Rummy a chance to make them look bad. I wouldn't be surprised that the leak came out of the WH. I for one am glad we are looking at these contingencies and think everyone is except a few peaceniks held over from the 60's who are longing for another VN and another chance to play peace loving patriot and act like Bush is Nixon. Cheap tricks that fool noone. 911 changed everything, the war came to us and that makes it different.