Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ironman
"Bottom line, the US is more secure with a mix of strategic AND tactical nuclear weapons. "

So would every other country but then would we be more secure? Our very superior conventional forces might then not be that superior. I prefer battles in our strong suit.

123 posted on 03/13/2002 10:44:25 AM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: ex-snook
You need to get a clue about proliferation. What we have and don't have in our arsenal has zero influence on the fastest growing nuclear powers and their arsenal make up. If the US followed your logic, we'd eventually end up getting black mailed. Are you one of those stealth anti-nuke activist types who was passing around those "sane freeze" petitions back around '82? Golitsyn warned us about so called "disarmament" and "peace movements" that had KGB as the head of the hydra. Well?
154 posted on 03/13/2002 5:33:19 PM PST by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson