[Bernard Marx]

Perrin: No current freeper by that name.

[rbmillerjr]

That's because he only wants to accept reason that supports his own positions........I checked myself and he was a member just 10 minutes ago

buh bye

[section9]

PERRIN, YOU ARE BUSTED!!!!!!!!!

Not only are you a mindless leftwinger with a penchant for hating your own country, but you are a rotten, no good

PLAGIARIST!!!!!!!!!

As much as I despise what Justin Raimondo writes from time to time, you do not have the right to steal his work, you rotten intellectual thief.

Here's your garbage...

These are not just contigency plans for an eventual strike back when the US is targeted by a nuclear ICBM.

This manifesto of nuclear madness rendered by an anonymous team of Dr. Strangeloves essentially states that the US will use nuclear weapons just as they damn well please, no longer as a last resort when their national survival is at stake, but to put down regional revolts on the farthest frontiers of their global empire. In short, as a response to "surprising military developments," nukes will now be used as weapons of conquest. Let's say the US invades Iraq, and the war starts to go badly, perhaps because other Arab countries enter the fray and US troops are caught in a general conflagration, a replay of what happened at that Marine barracks in Beirut only on a much larger scale. According to the new policy, in that case the US can always nuke 'em into submission. Indeed, the mere threat is enough to at least temper the thought of resistance, which is another reason I tend to think this "leak" was sprung from the top.

Now here's what Justin Raimondo wrote in his screed earlier today....

Thirdly, this manifesto of nuclear madness rendered by an anonymous team of Dr. Strangeloves essentially states that we will use nuclear weapons just as we damn well please, no longer as a last resort when our national survival is at stake, but to put down regional revolts on the farthest frontiers of our global empire. In short, as a response to "surprising military developments," nukes will now be used as weapons of conquest. Let's say we invade Iraq, and the war starts to go badly, perhaps because other Arab countries enter the fray and US troops are caught in a general conflagration, a replay of what happened at that Marine barracks in Beirut only on a much larger scale. According to the new policy, in that case we can always nuke 'em into submission. Indeed, the mere threat is enough to at least temper the thought of resistance, which is another reason I tend to think this "leak" was sprung from the top.

If you don't get banned from this board for this act of intellectual laziness and thievery, Jim Robinson ought to give us the reasons why.

Get lost, liberal plagiarist scum. Or should I say, farewell, Doris Kearns Goodwin!

Be Seeing You,

Chris