[rdb3]

Hey! Way to go. I'm glad you can argue this from a scientific perspective cause I surely can not. It's not my discipline.

With all of our so-called knowledge and "enlightenment," we can not specifically explain how the Egyptians created the pyramids with the technology they had at that time. If we can't do this, which we know was created by man, how much harder would it be to think that man is a made being, not some act of random chance? But anyway, you da man!

[Dimensio]

If we can't do this, which we know was created by man, how much harder would it be to think that man is a made being, not some act of random chance? But anyway, you da man!

Good point. And the creator of man, how could he have come into being by random chance? Obviously the creator has a creator!

[RadioAstronomer]

Hey! Way to go. I'm glad you can argue this from a scientific perspective cause I surely can not. It's not my discipline.

You may want to do a little research before extolling his arguments.

[Harrison Bergeron]

"...we can not specifically explain how the Egyptians created the pyramids with the technology they had at that time. "

Yes, we can. Yes, we did. At this time, there at least three plausible theories, the current favorite being the ramp and pulley method. The pyramids lie only about a mile from the nearest quarry, and the slabs from which the stones were cut are in plain view, as are the paths on which the stones were dragged.

Bad science and lack of knowledge are a terrible combination.