[Marylander]

Never trust a "scientist" using his science to argue for policy.

This goes for "scientists" of any political persuasion.

If he's arguing for policy by using his science he's an activist first, scientist second.

I once believed the two activities could be logically separated, but I am now convinced human nature decrees no one can to do both.

[George Frm Br00klyn Park]

"I once believed the two activities could be logically separated, but I am now convinced human nature decrees no one can to do both."

M, With RARE exception to that rule. It seems to fit Orwell's "bad is good and good is bad" writings. The "exception" has become the "rule", and "science" has become subjective to the whims of "present" {any given} day man. This is NOT good. Peace and love, George.