Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre
Ok. If you want to enforce your definition of "species", then the title of the artical could simply be changed to "our sub-species mated with other human sub-species, says study".

That would be the taxonomically correct way to phrases it.

I think we can agree on the meaning of the title, regardless of the terms or definitions of those terms, can't we?

As long as the author was just careless in his definitions and not trying to convey a sensationalist "Tarzan mated with Chita to produce Boy's ape-man step-brother" headline.

My own personal opinion is that Homo sapien males probably never mated with Neandertal females until they had invented alcoholic beverages. ;-)

115 posted on 03/07/2002 10:46:42 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Polybius
Would you say a donkey is merely a subspecies of horse? Because there have been rare instances where mules have been able to reproduce.
116 posted on 03/07/2002 10:52:11 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Polybius
Neandertal females

My uncle Nub used to call them sheep.

118 posted on 03/07/2002 10:58:16 AM PST by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson