That, I believe, is not true. I have been watching this very closely (I live within a few miles from the VD's). I have never heard about a fingerprint of Westerfield's in Danielle's room. Unless, this is a brand new "leak".
Man to Face Murder Charge "Westerfield, a divorced, self-employed engineer with two children, was taken into custody Friday shortly after authorities said that DNA test results showed Danielle's blood on an article of his clothing and in his motor home and other DNA evidence on an article of Danielle's clothing in her bedroom." (February 26)
I am having difficulty finding the article I read. I find it curious, however, that I CAN FIND THE SENTENCE what I previously read on a google search, but THE LINK NO LONGER WORKS:
"the desert on February 2. His fingerprints were found in Danielle's bedroom. The ... motive. "I must conclude that Danielle van Dam is no longer living and ...
www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,3858532%255E912,00.html"
This is strange, indeed. Perhaps they took it off to avoid poisoning potential jurors, I don't know. But that is the exact sentence I had read, and it wasn't only on the "www.theadvertiser.news.com" website. Your thoughts?