Skip to comments.
The Security Council must direct the United States that it may not attack Iraq
http://www.iacenter.org ^
| December 11, 2001
| Ramsey Clark
Posted on 03/06/2002 5:43:47 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I think this is an offense worthy of treason charges, or at least a public humiliation/firing. Can he be courtmarshalled? GRRRRRR
To: counterrevolutionary
What you said.
4
posted on
03/06/2002 5:48:08 PM PST
by
dighton
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
It's for sure now...this man has completely lost his mind, he needs someone to help him find it.
To: Jewels1091
Ramsey should be kicked out of the U.S and the United Nations right behind him! Screw them both!!
7
posted on
03/06/2002 5:51:47 PM PST
by
Russ
To: dighton
The traitorous jackass Clark apparently doesn't know that the US is a permanent member of the Security Council, and would therefore simply veto any such resolution.
But when have lefties ever let their abysmal ignorance of reality get in the way of their lunatic ravings?
It's kind of unfortunate, too, because if the Security Council were to start giving us orders, that might just be the impetus this nation needs to get out of the UN, which I've always considered a good idea, but too unlikely in the short term to merit serious discussion.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Many hundreds have been killed, including as an illustration of the meaning of such bombing, Leila al Attar, the internationally famous artist, museum director, wife, mother, human being. You think Ramsey was dating her? This screed is so hysterical and over the top, it's gotta be a personal thing.
9
posted on
03/06/2002 5:54:11 PM PST
by
Argus
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The sad thing is that the Security Council will give this trash serious consideration.
10
posted on
03/06/2002 5:54:31 PM PST
by
SKempis
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I guess anyone can send a letter to the ambassador and foreign minister of each member of the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly.
To: SKempis; all
FReepathon Continues!GREAT FREEPER QUOTE FROM THE FREEPATHON THREAD:
2366 posted on 3/3/02 6:57 PM Pacific by McGavin999
"A lot of people come to FreeRepublic on a daily basis for their news. Strangely, many of them never stop to think about how this site is paid for. Many have no idea that FreeRepublic is fully funded by the people who use the site.
If everyone who was registered donated $1 a month, we'd never have to have a fund raiser. Unfortunately, that doesn't happen. Some people think their $5 or $10 wouldn't make a difference, but it would."
Have a Heart!
Do Your Part!
12
posted on
03/06/2002 5:57:41 PM PST
by
Jen
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The Security Council must direct the United States that it may not attack Iraq and must cease threatening to do so. Try and stop us.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The Pentagon admits it conducted 110,000 aerial sorties against a defenseless Iraq dropping 88,500 tons of bombs equivalent to 7 1/2 Hiroshima bombs in 42 days from January 17 to February 28, 1991. DEFENSELESS?!? Gee, I guess all those tracers flying over Baghdad on the night of 17 January were just, um, Muslim festival fireworks! Yeah, that's the ticket! Never mind that the airspace over Iraq was one of the most heavily defended, in terms of AAA and SAMs, in the world!
Will somebody kindly get this senile old man away from a computer before he hurts himself? Dear Lord in Heaven, how a man like this ever held an Executive-branch office in this great country's government, I will never know...
}:-)4
14
posted on
03/06/2002 5:59:37 PM PST
by
Moose4
To: SKempis
The sad thing is that the Security Council will give this trash serious consideration. This was sent on December 11, 2001, and this is the first I've heard of it. I don't think anyone gave it serious consideration--at least not in public.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Dear Ramsey: I would have written sooner but I couldn't spell PPPPPPPHHHHHUUUUTTTTTT.
Regards, Adrastus.
16
posted on
03/06/2002 6:06:57 PM PST
by
Adrastus
To: counterrevolutionary
I don't think that the political climate would allow the "security council" to act on this in the manner consistent with their leftist, redistributionist, thievin', sorry, ill-mannered, disgusting ways. The general public in the US would then agree with FR in saying:
Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!
17
posted on
03/06/2002 6:16:24 PM PST
by
meyer
To: Dave Dilegge; KLT; hellinahandcart
Here is an old friend of ours talking SH*T again!!
I guess our journey into the belly of the beast didn't do anything except give them agitta!!
18
posted on
03/06/2002 6:31:52 PM PST
by
Nitro
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Let's see if I have this right:
Ramsey Clark believes that unless the Security Council passes a resolution barring the United States from attacking Iraq, that the United States can legally do so.
The U.S. is a permanent member of the Security Council, and can veto any resolutions before that body.
And the problem is? Sounds like we have Iraq right where we want them.
Thanks Ramsey!
To: meyer
Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN! Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!
Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!
etc., etc., etc.
20
posted on
03/06/2002 6:48:30 PM PST
by
Pushi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson