[cracker]

re 106, you are babbling incoherently in response to a straightforwatd statement.

If you have a coherent argument to make, rather than ad hominems and non sequiturs, I'd like to hear it. Can you answer the questions in my 106?

[tallhappy]

If you have a coherent argument

I made a coherent statement, an observation.

You posed no questions. When I say your post was incoherent I mean it.

For example data is not cultural no matter what the context. It is not data is it can be relative.

Pointing out a massive shortcoming in your post is not ad hominum. Ad hominum would be saying you are immoral or because you have red hair (or whatever) you are this that or the other thing.