Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gfactor
the problem with this analogy is that it only makes one attempt -- ie, there is no re-evaluation -- to use the parlance of genetic algoriths, no fitness function. that is a key part of the iteration: make random guesses, check for fitness, modify highest fitting etc... I'd like to see what the chances are if these monkeys had some appropriate fitness function. something based on an english dictionary.

So you're saying this accident called evolution somehow learned from its mistakes?

36 posted on 03/05/2002 1:39:15 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Gawain
So you're saying this accident called evolution somehow learned from its mistakes?

more accurate would be that it forgets its mistakes and works on its successes....

97 posted on 03/05/2002 2:52:52 PM PST by gfactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
So you're saying this accident called evolution somehow learned from its mistakes?

Only in the sense that its mistakes get weeded out, and thus its successes accumulate, providing a "step up" for the next cycle of trial and error.

484 posted on 12/09/2002 2:26:51 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson