The ONLY reason that I have focused on analyzing and repeatedly pointing out the NRST's fallacies and weak points is that you shills REALLY pi$$ed me off with your constant barrage of spam!!!
I see, You are just a disinterested person who does like to read supporting evidence. Thus you take it upon youself to demogogue an issue to try and kill the ongoing communications so you don't have to be bothered.
Spam, Willie Green is in the eye of the beholder. What I provide is information from which to make a reasoned judgement as opposed to mere unvarnished personal opinion. The information is available to all, and any are encourage to refute any part of what is provided. I enjoy reasoned debate you see, based on substantiate information.
I abhor baseless opinon and uncontested statements. I enjoy your introductions when they occur, unfortunately your to busy being defensive and trying to find "fallacies and weak points" to actually benefit from the discussion and move on to addition areas to investigate.
I any case your replies help keep the thread going, and provide opinion on which to comment and expand the discussion.
Whether or not a particular individual's contribution is wholly accurate, missleading or even lies, is of no significance in the end. It all is evaluated by the readers of these threads with as broad a span of information as is possible to build deeper understanding and more solidly based opinion on. That is what it is ultimately all about.
My main focus in this forum are taxes,
first the NRST because I really do believe it hold the best potential for moving toward a better economy and more informed public as regards the true cost of government in their lives.
Second tax history and law, to provide a counterpoint and information as regards what fails in law and hopefully somebody will come up with something that can actually work to kill the income tax for real instead of just put good folks in jail at worst, or confiscating their wealth through perpetual legal actions with an uncaring bureaucracy.
Unfortunately you never seem to be really interested in learning or even advancing you views into accurate and substantive points, you only stick with a very small handful of comments, never changing or getting more accurate or better. You really do a disservice to yourself and everyone else in remain on such a narrow range.
You should be challanged to refine your presentation Willie, but all you do is repeat you same old score then gripe when another such as myself provides the same old rebuttal. It's a perpetual merry-go-round that cannot end for inaccuracies must be answered.
Find better arguments based on solid information that we all can appreciate Willie, and support them with something other than just more spin. That does not good for yourself or anybody for that matter.
That's why I post them. I paid my dues actually attempting to discuss the NRST. All I got in return was convoluted arguements and personal attacks whenever I disagreed or pointed out fallacies. My posts reflect that extensive experience, and hopefully, will enable others to more quickly see what a farce the NRST actually is.
My main focus in this forum are taxes,
I know. A "shill".
BTW, the subject of your sentence (focus) is singular,
to be in agreement, the verb used should be "is", not "are".
(It would probably be better to change the object from "taxes" to "taxation" as well.)