Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
** - Democrats are, by definition, constitutionally unfit to navigate the ship of state In the beginning, the Democrats had a good foundation. Inspired/&?founded by Thomas Jefferson, and wanting a strict interpretation of the Constitution. What is the history, of were the Democrats went wrong?

FYI - On the Democratic side, I just received an email from Chuck Pineda, who is on the Dem ballot opposing Gray Davis. He stated, "I support traditional values and the right to bear arms."
For California DEMOCRATS! Email Subject:   VOTE * Chuck Pineda, Jr. * for Governor!
* Encouraging Democrats to Say NO! to G.G Davis on March 5th!
Democrats, let's rally around the name ** Chuck Pineda, Jr. **, who is on the Democrat ballot for Governor! It is time for Democrats to work for restoration and reform in the Democratic Party! email: californiademocrats2002@yahoo.com
++++++
Also FYI - Visit:   http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/latest
A Political/Cultural News Forum - Search for: Golden Gate

13 posted on 03/04/2002 1:15:17 AM PST by Golden Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Gate
Would that we could put clinton in Jefferson's petri dish Q ERTY6 rodham clinton REALITY CHECK BUMP!
Two hundred or so years ago, we had Jefferson, Washington, Ben Franklin and Tom Paine, and there were four million people. Today we have more than 220 million, and look at our leaders...Darwin was wrong."

Mort Sahl, 1998

contingency principle
 
by Mia T
 

 

A trait or strategy that is successful at one time may be unsuccessful at another. Evolution is not progress. Populations are simply adapting to their current surroundings. Populations do not necessarily become better in any absolute sense over time.
 
Take RAPE. It may have been an evolutionary imperative for Homo erectus in the Pleistocene Epoch, but one can hardly argue that it is adaptive behavior for Homo sapiens in the year 2000, Boy Rapist-President notwithstanding.
 
 
 

This contingency principle was demonstrated experimentally (Paquin and Adams) with a yeast culture that was maintained for many generations. Occasionally, a mutant strain would arise that increased reproductive success. These mutant strains would crowd out the formerly dominant strains. Samples of the most successful strains from the culture were taken across time. In later competition experiments, each strain would outcompete the immediately previously dominant type in a culture. However, some earlier isolates could outcompete strains that arose late in the experiment. (Would that we could put clinton in Jefferson's petri dish.) Competitive ability of a strain was always better than its previous type, but competitiveness in a general sense was not increasing.

 
Any organism's success depends on the behavior of its contemporaries. (If you doubt this, just ask David Schippers.) For most traits or behaviors, there is likely no optimal design or strategy, only contingent ones.
 

Mort Sahl: No desire to meet clinton: "With no morality, there's nothing there"

20 posted on 03/04/2002 5:15:33 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson