[Doctor Stochastic]

"Please list 5 journals that will accept non-evolutionary viewpoints for peer review."

Acta Biotheoretica
Bioscience
Genetics, Selection, Evolution
Mammalian Genome
Nature
Trends in Biological Sciences

Of, course, the paper must be scientific, not religious. Certainly none of the self-published papers on Dembski's (as of last fall) would qualify.

[Exnihilo]

Hi Doctor Stochastic. I was wondering if you could explain for us, specifically how Dr. Dembski's ID Theory is religious. I'm confident that you've taken the time to read all of his work, and that you understand what his theory says. So, please I ask you, tell us how ID theory is "religious". I would encourage you to cite specific papers that Dembski has published, and you might go so far as to quote him in order to make your case. I'll even go further and allow you to discontinue use of the word "religious" and simply go to "unscientific". Definitions of the terms you use here will also help. I'm sure we will all be anxiously awaiting your thorough explaination!