Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale; abner; aculeus; alaskanfan; alloysteel; Always Right; America's Resolve; Angelique...
"You, too, can live on a leased lot on gummint land."

The true statist point of view.

First, there is no such thing as government land. - The constitution forbids government holding of land, other than military reservations, and the District of Columbia.

The National Forests are totally outside the provisions of the constitution, and at this time violate the unconstitutional statute that created them in the first place.

If you had any knowledge at all, you would realize that these cabins are not in any way substitutes for an apartment. They are located far from jobs, schools, and supermarkets, and most are not suitable for year around habitation.

42 posted on 03/02/2002 6:28:41 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
First, there is no such thing as government land. - The constitution forbids government holding of land, other than military reservations, and the District of Columbia.

Just to clarify, the Constitution does not forbid the governments of the States from holding land. In fact, the equal footing doctrine dictates that the Federal government should have quit-claimed the lands of the territories when they became states. It didn't, in direct violation of the Constitution. Why? Congress was funding operations from land sales.

Congress effectively diluted the citizenship of those states when they did not quit-claim the land. As far as I am concerned, since the adoption 14th Amendmen,t this has been a violation of the equal protection clause.

44 posted on 03/02/2002 8:56:20 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
BTTT!!!!!
48 posted on 03/03/2002 2:26:11 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor; Carry_Okie; "NWO"; Geopolitics; Gov_Watch; Black Jade; M1991; cdwright...
"Ephemeral stream" is any trickle of water located anywhere snow is melting and flowing downhill. The proposed language states that human activity is not allowed within 150 feet of an ephemeral stream. Cabins are a human activity, as are camping, hiking, fishing, mountain biking and so on. Almost every cabin in the Sierra is surrounded by melting snow in the spring.

No human activity could occur within 300 feet of a meadow, stream bank, lake or river.

Guys, The fascist legislation is finally stating the policy maker's actual "reasoning{?}" in the language of the bills DESIGNED to move people away from WATER sources that cannot be controlled. WHY???? Is it actually possible that the "water engines" I've heard about over the last few years might actually work? ENERGY in small safe units available to the masses would DEVASTATE the plans of those who would control all. WHY the sudden escalation of "rural cleansing"?? Peace and love, George.
54 posted on 03/03/2002 4:04:21 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
bump
57 posted on 03/03/2002 5:21:33 AM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson