And why not? They are adults,and not doing anything illegal.
Are you one?
No,but thank you for asking.
You seem to agree that what happened to Danielle is terrible, yet you think that swinging is okay, and that the parents lifestyle is not in any way responsible for endangering or the death of their child.
Good. I was afraid I wasn't being understood.
You keep defending swinging and the open relationship lifestyle.
OK,so what?
Please be honest with us as to why. I suspect you are a swinger yourself.
I defend it because I believe in personal freedom,and I've known and been friends with people who did this.I'm flattered that you keep asking,but I don't do this myself.
Since you are not a swinger, yet you are defending the rights of swingers to swing in their homes with children. Yet, you say you are for freedom. I guess you missed the part that doing so can and does endanger your own children. I guess you are not really reading this particular case very well.
For you to say it's fine that they didn't check on their children for 11 hours, and that it's fine to bring strangers into the house (and not check on one's kids) shows you have a lack of any child rearing sense.
May I inquire if you have any children of your own? And if you had small children would you not be concerned about their safety if the door alarm had gone off twice, and, especially with a small blonde girl child, you wouldn't have made sure she was okay?
And if you reply that yes you would have made sure, you have blown your argument to bits. Because it shows that any normal parent would have made sure the kids were okay. And most, thank goodness, don't swing.
Anyways, you are just arguing for arguments sake alone. You don't even believe in what you are arguing. You have already admitted to not being a swinger, so you are just someone who feels the need to argue. You have no interest in this issue, except to further your argumentativeness.