‘It Isn’t Over Yet’:SDPD Chief Bejarano talks about latest developments in van Dam Case

Newsweek-Website ^ | March 1, 2002 | NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE

[SlickWillard]

Thanks.

[Danielle]

You can all jump on me for the rumor thing, but how do you make ends meet at $125,000/yr.(gross)and a mortgage of $300,000? That is a big jump in risk.

That is not an unusual amount for a mortgage to salary ratio. Most mortgages are 30 years.

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

Good work, Travis - no doubt you have some ins with the locals.

[DreamWeaver]

I don't suppose it occurs to any of you that if you dress your daughter like a whore, she might just grow up to be a whore.

When are people going to realize ( especially parents) that the way a person dresses, the image you project, is "making a statement." THAT is common sense.

[SlickWillard]

When are people going to realize ( especially parents) that the way a person dresses, the image you project, is "making a statement." THAT is common sense.

I dunno. I made the mistake of getting into this discussion again on another thread, and I got lambasted again. What the hell - if they wanna raise their daughters to dress like whores, then let 'em raise their daughters to dress like whores. I've done my civic duty.

[fnord]

Sneakypete has been banned!

That is so not right, even if I disagree with him on this topic. It is weird that someone this upstanding can be banned for over 24 hours ...

[Naked Lunch]

Sneakypete has been banned!

Wow, I didn't think his posts were rash enough for him to be banned. Hope he gets back, suitably chastened, of course. :)

What is banning exactly? Can you still read the posts, just not write any? Or are you prevented from accessing the site in any form?

Cause if he can still read the posts, now's my chance to get some arguments in edgewise.

[Chapita]

How can you contest such a decision when the moderator has deleted your posts?

[Fury]

if they wanna raise their daughters to dress like whores, then let 'em raise their daughters to dress like whores

You again? Please stop this...

[Amore]

Did you read sneakypete's posts? I did, and the vast majority of them were personal attacks upon posters he did not agree with. That's what Jim Rob told us not to do from the get-go, and he recently authored a Vanity Post which was posted several times reiterating that we were not to make personal attacks. I doubt his banning is permanent, but considering what Jim Rob said, I think he definitely qualified for a "time out."

[Chapita]

Did he hurt your feelings?

[Amore]

No, he didn't. We only had a couple of exchanges, which I recall as being civil. I was sort of surprised, actually, considering the personal attacks he was making on some other people.

[Chapita]

Apparently, I got disgusted at some of the B/S and quit early on.

If you are civil to him; he will be civil with you!

I am learning how to quit a thread when I am getting mad. And queers and child molestors make me very mad, very quickly!

[Amore]

No, unfortunately I don't agree. He was flaming people
who had done nothing to invoke his personal attacks.

[Chapita]

Well, I guess there is a first time for everything! Since the moderator has deleted his posts, I couldn't contest your assertions.

[A.J.Armitage]

You are an idiot and a pervert. Chokers have nothing to do with S&M, and ankle bracelets... well, you're an idiot.

[Freedom2specul8]

FYI... :)

[Freedom2specul8]

FYI... (LOL)

[Naked Lunch]

Is it just me, or did this thread dry up when SneakyPete was banned? Now all we have is someone ranting about neck chokers. Ahhh, give me pluralism.

[Freedom2specul8]

Sneaky Pete is back now! I don't know if he's posting yet. :)