Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CapandBall
Scientific theorys belong in science class, religion belongs in philosophy class. Whats wrong with that?

I agree, but let's add a couple of words

Scientific theories belong in science class, religion belongs in philosophy class. Intelligent design theories belongs in the class, also. What's wrong with that?

What is so scary about the theory of Intelligent design ?

Must be the competition???

41 posted on 02/28/2002 7:45:35 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: JZoback
There are NO Facts to back up intelligent design, it is a disguised version of creationism. You cannot prove something that is supposed to be taken on faith, that is why it is based on faith, it CANNOT be proven.

And since he is obviously NOT going to look up the word theory and its definition, I will do it for him.

the·o·ry [theeeree , theeree ] (plural the·o·ries) noun

5. scientific principle to explain phenomena: a set of facts, propositions, or principles analyzed in their relation to one another and used, especially in science, to explain phenomena
44 posted on 02/28/2002 7:54:00 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: JZoback
Intelligent design theories belongs in the class, also. What's wrong with that?

Write a book, get published, get a doctorate degree, start teaching. When it has had a big enough following for long enough, it may be introduced into educational curriculum. Where would "Intelligent design theories" fit? Science, philosophy, in between or somewhere else alltogeather?

54 posted on 02/28/2002 8:04:20 PM PST by CapandBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson