[tauneutrino]

I usuallly lurk and almost never post. But I have to ask. Why do you have it in for RadioAstronomer? What has he/she done to you? Lately you seem to be following that individual thru the threads trashing him/her personally.

[Aric2000]

He trashes anyone that can actually explain evolution and scientific theories in a simple and coherent way.

It makes him crazy, Radioastronomer knows his stuff, and writes it out very well. Unlike me, I tend to wander and go off on rants etc. Radioastronomer is dangerous to fchristian, because of that coherent way of writing and explaining that he has. So he does whatever he can to discredit him, by personally attacking etc, because he has NO facts to debate Radioastronomer with.

I find it pretty sad actually, and it makes F Christian look like some kind of crazy fanatic, whoops, that's right, he is a fanatic. NEVER MIND.....

[oldcats]

He has a mind and is not afraid to use it...both are frightening to some here.
I will not go further with this as to not offend, or to bring down their warth on me. :)
Oldcats

[f.Christian]

"Consider someone who believes that Venus is smaller than Mercury-not because he has evidence, but because he read it in a comic book and always believes whatever he reads in comic books-or consider someone who holds that belief on the basis of an outrageously bad argument. Perhaps there is no obligation he has failed to meet; nevertheless his intellectual condition is defective in some way. He displays a sort of deficiency, a flaw, an intellectual dysfunction of some sort. Perhaps he is like someone who has an astigmatism, or is unduly clumsy, or suffers from arthritis. And perhaps the evidentialist objection is to be construed, not as the claim that the theist without evidence has violated some intellectual obligations, but that he suffers from a certain sort of... intellectual deficiency."