While your assertion may or may not be true, the problem is that you assertion is highly uninformative. You did not argue anything about why this particular information has to be believed or not. Your statement is more like drive-by-hit by some shill from some agency. I hope that is not the case. If so, you had better be more specific about your assertion.
This publication always runs off at the mouth without concrete evidence. After the 3rd or 4th time it makes them useless as a source of reliable information.