Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Did you know male and female studies show substantially different last-common-ancestor dates? (I forget just now which one is later and what the difference is.)

Actually I was aware of that. The age of the oldest common male ancestor is much more recent than the age of the most common female ancestor. And, as you say, my side is always ready with some kind of explanation....

This is just what one would expect to find if the last common ancestor of all living women, Eve, lived many generations before the last common ancestor of all males, Noah. Recall that all men to survive in the ark were directly related, while the four women in the Ark were not related. It would therefore not be suprising for males to have less diversity than females in gene regions unique to each sex.

PS- The Deluge of Noah would also explain the 'genetic bottleneck' you mentioned earlier.

To all, Vade does not seem to think the thread I linked to in my earlier post has much of value to say. I am afraid I must politely disagree. It was an excellent run down on the genetic evidence for the date of human origins. But don't take my word for it, click on the link yourselves and see who YOU think makes the best case.

25 posted on 02/27/2002 6:35:08 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Ahban
This is just what one would expect to find if the last common ancestor of all living women, Eve, lived many generations before the last common ancestor of all males, Noah. Recall that all men to survive in the ark were directly related, while the four women in the Ark were not related. It would therefore not be suprising for males to have less diversity than females in gene regions unique to each sex.

PS- The Deluge of Noah would also explain the 'genetic bottleneck' you mentioned earlier.

I was talking more about the completely bullet-proof generic "Goddidit" approach, not Biblical literalism. I'm surprised you're trying to make the Noahic Flood work. That takes you out of the realm of bad biology into execrable geology. And how many generations are there from Eve to Noah?

To all, Vade does not seem to think the thread I linked to in my earlier post has much of value to say. I am afraid I must politely disagree. It was an excellent run down on the genetic evidence for the date of human origins. But don't take my word for it, click on the link yourselves and see who YOU think makes the best case.
Let me know what you hear.
26 posted on 02/28/2002 8:30:38 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson