[Vinny]

That's the Big Bunk theory isn't it? Everything went "bang" and everything just came into being out of nowhere kinda like when the magician pulls the rabbit out of his hat "from nowhere"?

[billybudd]

Are we still talking about evolution or have we switched to the Big Bang? Anyway, the Big Bang theory doesn't say that everything came out of "nowhere". It simply says that in the beginning, the universe was condensed into a very small space, which gradually expanded. As the universe cooled, it became stable enough to support particle matter. These were the particles that combined to form the atoms of our world. This theory is supported by plenty of physical evidence, including the fact that the universe is expanding to this day.
Instead of dismissing reasoned theories for which there is plenty of evidence as "bunk", why don't you actually attempt to pick apart their logical inconsistencies, if you think there are any. Better yet, you could just admit that these are the best theories we have about the mechanics of the formation of the universe.
I can't understand the utter hostility that people have towards the ideas of evolution and the big bang. They don't conflict with Christianity or the Bible. They don't conflict with Genesis. So why all the ruckus?