Huh? YOU posted the article.
Let's see. You post an article. Complain when someone responds who disagrees with you. Set out to ridicule them all the while giggling with your freeper buddies. Quite a passtime you have going.
Slow life or none at all?
Let's see. You post an article. Complain when someone responds who disagrees with you. Set out to ridicule them all the while giggling with your freeper buddies. Quite a passtime you have going.
Not as much fun as making up facts and imagining the unheard giggles of people you’ve never met, oddball.
You know, everybody is laughing at you and talking behind your back. I can hear them, can you?
His article had nothing to do with creationism. Some FReepers go crazy when they come across a thread that might have anything to do with evolution. Then they try to hijack those threads and turn them into crevo debate threads.
Go away. If you don't want to actually discuss the material on the thread, don't come to it, and then leave some intellectual droppings behind before wandering off to another thread. Add something interesting, criticize the thread based on its content, but don't just mouth a party line "evolution equals bad, me no think there evidence for evolution," it's obnoxious.
Maybe I should go onto all the religious threads I can find, and post things like "The religion has more holes than a dozen doughnuts and, not surprisingly, a biased, evangelical news source rambles on like Christianity is fact. No, Christianity is a lame theory without sufficient historical evidence that contradicts scientific observation throughout human history." Or maybe I shouldn't. Because it would be obnoxious.