Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jerry_M
ref #302. Nope. Went back and looked. I hadn't noticed it as an offering for "U". Otherwise I would have posted it, which I will shortly do. (I'll modify it a bit to turn it into one sentence, so you address the modification, OK?)
403 posted on 02/28/2002 5:34:56 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Why would I want to "address the modification"? (In fact, why should we bother at all?)

We took the effort to nail down our understanding of "T", but then spent a considerable amount of effort spinning our wheels trying to get you to address it. Eventually you come out with "I don't agree", but then refuse to post reasons why you disagree. (I get the feeling that you can't give us a rationale explanation of why it is wrong, you just feel that it must be wrong.)

Doesn't seem like you are interested in promoting understanding, it appears to me that your plot is to develop neat cubby holes in which you can place us and thus feel comfortable that you can dismiss us because our cubby holes are not to your liking.

This "exercise" may make you feel good, but we refuse to participate, believing that we know your ulterior motive.

When you decide that you want to participate in a discussion designed to foster understanding, then we will continue. Until that time we will occupy ourselves with other things.

405 posted on 02/28/2002 5:41:44 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson