Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taiwanese Praise Bush, Slam Clinton
CNSNews.com ^ | 2/25/02 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 02/25/2002 1:56:23 AM PST by kattracks

Pacific Rim Bureau (CNSNews.com) - Taiwanese leaders, media and citizens are praising President Bush for his firm backing for their democratic island state during his visit to Beijing. They said Bush's support contrasted sharply with his predecessor's views, spelled out at a conference in Australia just a day after Bush flew home.

During his brief China visit, Bush called Friday for a "peaceful resolution" of the dispute between Taiwan and the mainland, pointedly declining when pressed to support "peaceful reunification." He also reiterated America's commitment to defend Taiwan if necessary.

The following day, former President Clinton addressed a conference in Sydney where -- in a speech for which he was reportedly paid $300,000 ($153,000 in U.S. dollars) -- he said reunification was inevitable.

Noting the "economic and personal interaction" underway across the Taiwan Strait, Clinton told his audience "the important thing is that time is taking care of this problem ... sensible people are moving to a resolution everyone can live with."

The conference participants also issued a declaration denouncing what they called a "breakaway scheme" on the part of pro-independence elements in Taiwan, "aided by foreign forces."

While there was no indication that Clinton, as guest speaker, had actually endorsed the declaration, the fact that he spoke at the same event was picked up by the official Chinese media.

The People's Daily in its report Monday stressed that the declaration had been "unanimously agreed" upon.

China regards Taiwan as a renegade province which must be reunited with the mainland - by force if necessary. Taiwan maintains that it is a sovereign state.

'Orchestrated by Beijing'

Outside the Sydney conference venue, anti-Beijing demonstrators protested. At one point scuffles broke out between protestors and a couple of conference delegates who came outside to remonstrate, and police stepped in to separate them, eyewitnesses said.

Pam Little, a Taiwanese expatriate lawyer who participated in the demonstration, said Monday the Taiwanese-Australian community had been disappointed at Clinton's association with the 2002 World Congress on the Peaceful Reunification of China.

The group organizing the conference, she said by phone from Sydney, was widely viewed in the community as a front for Beijing.

"Although we have no evidence we feel this so-called reunification congress was very much sponsored or orchestrated by the Chinese government in its attempt to divide the overseas Taiwanese community, to force them to take a stand for or against reunification."

Little said the public mood in Taiwan right now was for a continuation of the status quo - "hard-won democracy and freedom" - and the suggestion that a merger was inevitable was "outrageous."

Protestors had included members of the community in Sydney, while others had flown in from other Australian cities. Leading Chinese dissident Wei Jingsheng, who was jailed in China for 17 years, also participated.

According to a press agency report, Wei said Clinton should not be taking part in the conference, and then called on him to come outside to address the demonstrators, saying the former president would do so if he still believed in American values.

"Of course, we don't have A$300,000 to pay him," Wei added.

'Incompatible systems'

Little said the protestors had not been surprised at Clinton's participation, but felt it was "inappropriate."

"The American people enjoy democracy. How can one work on the assumption that going back to China is the only political future for Taiwan?" she asked.

"I thought that the fundamental principle of democracy was self-determination. The Taiwanese people should be given a fair go to decide that."

By contrast, Little praised Bush's statements in Beijing, noting that he had stressed peaceful resolution rather than reunification.

"The two systems are totally incompatible - the totalitarian system in China and a thriving democracy now in Taiwan. How can anyone suggest with the current situation that the two should merge as one?"

'Sacrificing Taiwan'

In Taiwan, meanwhile, Vice President Annette Lu at the weekend also drew a distinction between Bush and his predecessor.

During a speech at a panel discussion on Taiwan's future, Lu praised Bush's supportive remarks in Beijing, but said by contrast that "Clinton didn't hesitate to sacrifice and harm Taiwan by uttering the 'three nos'..."

During his visit to China in 1998, Clinton declared his administration would not support an independent China; not recognize "two Chinas"; and would not support Taiwan's attempt to be admitted to international organizations which require members to be sovereign states.

Bush made no public mention of the "three nos" during his visit, although he did mention the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, which commits to U.S. to the defense of Taiwan.

In a hard-hitting editorial Sunday, the Taipei Times said Bush and Clinton were worlds apart, and accused the latter of "selling out his integrity" for $153,000.

"What [Clinton] said at the rally assumed that unification was not only a given, but also the right thing. His speech conveniently ignored the fact that the people of Taiwan reject unification and that they have a right to decide their own future."

Taiwanese media described Bush as the American president most supportive of Taiwan since Washington severed official diplomatic ties with Taipei in 1979.

Warning

Clinton had been urged ahead of his Australia visit not to participate in the conference. The U.S. pro-Taiwan lobby group, Formosan Association for Public Affairs, urged supporters to write the former president, pointing out that the conference organizers had a policy on Taiwan that was not in accordance with that of the U.S.

Noting that Bush would be in Beijing at the same time, FAPA warned Clinton that his attendance at the pro-unification event would be "trumpeted greatly in the PRC-controlled press."

If he decided nonetheless to go ahead, the group wrote, he should "clearly articulate U.S. policy. Failure to do so would most assuredly be used by the Beijing authorities in an effort to undercut President Bush."

See earlier stories:
Ahead Of China Visit, Bush Reiterates Commitment To Taiwan (Feb. 19, 2002)
Proposed Clinton Speech on Taiwan Draws Fire (Feb. 7, 2002)


E-mail a news tip to Patrick Goodenough.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/25/2002 1:56:23 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The following day, former President Clinton addressed a conference in Sydney where -- in a speech for which he was reportedly paid $300,000 ($153,000 in U.S. dollars) -- he said reunification was inevitable

Whoa, I must have missed something... people are still paying him to talk? If I could afford it, I'd pay him to shut the hell up and fade away with the little bit of pride he has.

According to a press agency report, Wei said Clinton should not be taking part in the conference, and then called on him to come outside to address the demonstrators, saying the former president would do so if he still believed in American values.
"Of course, we don't have A$300,000 to pay him," Wei added.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Klinton NEVER believed in American values! If he did, he wouldn't have sold sensitive info to Red China, and he most certainly would not have defiled the office of the Presidency the way that he did. I'm so glad that sensible Americans are not the only ones that despise the Klinton Klan.

"Clinton didn't hesitate to sacrifice and harm Taiwan by uttering the 'three nos'..."

Of course not, he's a damned Socialist himself.

In a hard-hitting editorial Sunday, the Taipei Times said Bush and Clinton were worlds apart, and accused the latter of "selling out his integrity" for $153,000.

You mean he actually had integrity left to sell?? Geez... where's he getting it from? Pan-dimensional a$$hole??

Thanks for the Humor first thing Monday Morning!!

FRegards,
PV

2 posted on 02/25/2002 2:59:20 AM PST by PurVirgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How pathetic. Although, I will conceded that Bush got taken aback byt the Q & A session at the Chinese University. He stumbled on the Taiwan questions so badly that I had to turn off the telescreen.
3 posted on 02/25/2002 4:50:07 AM PST by michaelje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In a hard-hitting editorial Sunday, the Taipei Times said Bush and Clinton were worlds apart, and accused the latter of "selling out his integrity" for $153,000.

Hey!! He sold out his own people for a blowjob!! You expected better treatment? Hell, look at the treasonous transfer of military secrets to China!!

Clinton must be getting some serious Peking poontang for his actions!

4 posted on 02/25/2002 5:30:30 AM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bttt
5 posted on 02/25/2002 9:31:23 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michaelje
telescreen

Telescreen? Where the heck are you from?
6 posted on 02/25/2002 9:34:16 AM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The two systems are totally incompatible - the totalitarian system in China and a thriving democracy now in Taiwan. How can anyone suggest with the current situation that the two should merge as one?"

Oh, if the Clintons and their ilk get their way, the USA will be totally restructured to resemble China in every facet.

7 posted on 02/25/2002 9:37:52 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BUMP
8 posted on 02/25/2002 10:09:50 AM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Hehe. Just started reading 1984 again.
9 posted on 02/25/2002 10:55:49 AM PST by michaelje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In a hard-hitting editorial Sunday, the Taipei Times said Bush and Clinton were worlds apart, and accused the latter of "selling out his integrity" for $153,000.

What was that comment about dragging a ten dollor bill through a trail park????

And for the record .. Clinton is not a socialist .. he was .. is and always will be a Communist

Now I am off to email this little bit of information to all my friends ... if the Media won't inform people .. then I will

10 posted on 02/25/2002 11:26:46 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson