To: RippleFire
"It was frustrating watching Gore try so hard not to appear smart in the debates. Why not just say" 'Here's my fucking résumé, what do you got?'" Aside from the grammar ("what do you got"), Bush's resume reads much better than Gore's.
To: RippleFire
"Bush's resume reads much better than Gore's." Excellent point!
And, if the lefties ever bothered to look, with the names blacked out, they'd agree.
The left is reduced to twerpism...
41 posted on
02/24/2002 8:14:40 AM PST by
okie01
To: RippleFire
Yes, Bush's resume does read better than Gore's. After all, Gore doesn't even have a master's degree - in anything.
But then again, we all know how liberals just love to portray themselves as absolute geniuses. They're so full of themselves it hurts.
To: RippleFire
Bush has only been in politics since 1994. Not much applicable resume there for the job of president. Oh well, he's doing a bang-up job of humiliating the GOP.
To: RippleFire
My main concern is the health and well being of the country. Sorkin has as much right to his misguided speech as any of us. What harm is there in our socirty for disent? This is America. In totalitarian states they shoot people for disent in America we deny them press coverage. We have a much better way of dealing with dissent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson