[TEXICAN II]

What ever happened to the old rule, 'If you have nothing nice to say, then just don't say anything'? It seems to be that hostility has eradicated civility. Or was the posted article filled with code words, or hate speech, provoking this mindless, in-effectual gesture? Maybe the reply is from someone who actually benefits from some UN $$? Maybe someone who has an agenda?

[Dave S]

What ever happened to the old rule, 'If you have nothing nice to say, then just don't say anything'? It seems to be that hostility has eradicated civility. Or was the posted article filled with code words, or hate speech, provoking this mindless, in-effectual gesture? Maybe the reply is from someone who actually benefits from some UN $$? Maybe someone who has an agenda?

Maybe someone who can see more with half a brain than four or five of tin foil folk can combined. What is it that drives those who are leaders of a country? Its power. Why would hundreds of sovereign leaders, many of them dictators, give up their power for some idealistic notion of one world government? They wouldnt, case closed. Tin foil can be purchased at your local grocery store. It does wonders in blocking out subliminal transmissions from the NWO/Trilateral/Bilderberger one world government propaganda machine.

[Asclepius]

... Maybe someone who has an agenda? ...

Oh, I do have an agenda. It's called valid inference. Try to follow me. There are many political parties. The Italian Fascists were a political party. Does it follow that all political parties are fascist? No. That would be ridiculous. Yet it is precisely this sort of non-reasoning that the author foists on his or her readers.

If I could I would do away with the UN altogether. But I would not sacrifice the canons of sound reasoning to do so. I believe reason is on our side anyway, so why abuse it?