Posted on 02/23/2002 10:06:14 AM PST by sixmil
It is amazing. Even more considering the fuel. 757's carry 30 tons of fuel. As much energy as in 300 tons of TNT.
Are you saying there might have been some sabotage on the sprinkler plumbing too. Hadn't thought of that, but Our new peaceful friends might well have hired on as plumbers and done a number there too.>
Boy, would I have loved to have seen that. Their own psychotic jihad mindset almost got them killed before they achieved their objective. Freaks.
Of course, if it HAD broken up in the air just before hitting the south tower, FR would have been overrun by "the US government did it"/"TWA 800! TWA 800!" conspiracy theories, so maybe it's better that it happened the way it did. (Factoring out the human deaths, of course.)
I would like to see the exact quote she gave and info from Boeing Engineering before I believed this one.
I know that some planes are designed to not break mach even if you point the nose straight down, but I do not know about airliners. I just remember hearing that the plane that Egyptian wacko committed suicide with broke off its wings as it plummeted nose first on full throttle.
I think he cut the engines (shut them down)
The fire ball occured outside the 2nd tower, remember? This whole afair remeinds me of the Murrah building fiasco.
Those receivers of forged Tennessee licenses were charged in an FBI sting operation (they had advance warning from a NY informant) along with a corrupt license examiner in Tennessee. She was freed on bond. The day before the first court hearing, she was burned to death in her car while driving down a highway.
She was alive when the fire started. It did not involve the gas tack of her car. And though there was a collision with a tree off the road, that happened after the fire started, according to witnesses. Looks like murder by arson to silence a witness.
Congressman Billybob
Since so many others have, to the best of their ability (hint: none of the "US government did it!" theories hold up under available evidence) I see no reason to waste any extra time on it myself. But thank you for proving my point.
I worked there for 8 years. The structure was quite strong, but the inner walls were junk.That's how it was designed. The outer walls (and if I remember right the innermost core) bore all the weight. This allowed larger open spaces (or conversely thinner walls) inside the building.
It wouldn't have mattered collapsewise if it had had a more traditional structure, since we're dealing with such high temperatures. Though I wouldn't rule out the idea of it collapsing sideways (and doing more damage to the neighborhood) if it had had such.
-Eric
Changing the subject, I wonder if any of the passengers in the first or second planes noticed the extra speed. This would have been a hint that things were not what they seemed.
In retrospect, stairwells at the corners of the buildings would have saved most of the victims.
Now you don't want them going too slow and falling out of the sky!;-)
Seriously, here around NYC I think they want them in and out as fast as possible. Tommorow afternoon when the winds pick-up and shift from the south to the west, I will be right it the flightline for Newark landings. They have no time to putter along going in and out about every 90 seconds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.