You are replying to post 73, where I was very specific about who perverts are. You attack my courage and integrity for failing to do precisely what I have done. I don't mind our civil debate, but calling names is beneath you. Maybe you need to rephrase your question or reread my answer. But you don't need to smear me. Would you care to try again in a civil manner?
You should know that when Khepera got suspended my idea of fair play on this board changed dramatically. I will be far less patient with personal attacks than I have been in the past. Partly I want to know what the rules are here on FR, and partly I want to be sure that the conservatives aren't hampered in a one-sided way. So I'll put it back to you. Go back to post 73 and read my answer. I believe it precisely answers your question. If you disagree, try rephrasing your question. But please don't attack my courage or integrity again without a quote to back it up.
FR is intended to be a civil discussion board.
Shalom.
I will miss her as well. From what I can glean, she is a little tired of the good guys getting suspended while the perverts have free reign.
This suggests to me, that you have very specific people in mind which you call "perverts". Personally I think it is quite cowardly and in fact reprehensible to smear people you don't even know as "perverts". I find it even MORE cowardly that you would make such a suggestion without having the courage and integrity to stand behind your words.
But of course you feel justified in your actions, so long as you make such smears while couching them in a Mr. Rogers tone of voice, and provided you say something about Jesus at the end.
The fact is though, that your actions are no less reprehensible, and no less cowardly for your demeanor. You do a disservice to your faith and to your intended goals by acting in such a fashion.