Yes, I have. I would think that if you have the audacity to call those who oppose you philosophically as "the perverts", that perhaps you'd actually have enough integrity and courage to name them. But.... I guess not.
Does this fishing expedition have a purpose?
Fishing expedition? You chose the words... not me. You'd think you'd be man enough to stand up and say what you meant.
Is this how people get suspended?
I don't know. I'm not involved in such decisions. But maybe you ought to take a moment and think about the nature of such a comment, if it makes you wonder whether you might be suspended for it.
It is a rather rude thing to say, and that's precisely how you meant it.
All for Jesus of course.
It is rude. It is also precise and accurate.
From Dictionary.com:
n. (pûrvûrt)
One who practices sexual perversion.
But, once again, you are generally quick to assume what I mean, even when the word doesn't have as well known a meaning as pervert. Why, this time, were you asking me for details? You have never asked me what I mean by 'morality' or 'morals', for example. Yet we have discussed it many times and I have begun to think that you don't use the terms the same way I do, so clarification is needed. But in this case you ask.
When someone changes character so abruptly, it does cause others to wonder why.
Shalom.
P.S. I don't know if you are a pervert or not. You haven't discussed your sexual behavior with me, for which I am profoundly greatful. You have defended perversion. But that does not make you a pervert.