Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Khepera
We have been very successful at observing their actions in public places.

Then your true objection is to public sexuality, and not homosexuality?

If so, then why not just say so, and advaocate a position which discourages public sexuality (whether hetero or homo)?

Or could it be that this is a convenient excuse?

The other thing is that our current government has allowed them to spread their perverted ideas advocating participation in their activities in our public schools and institutions. This should not be allowed any more than their public actions should be allowed.

And here again, it seems that your beef is more with the dissemination of ideas you disapprove of in public schools (and being forced to pay for it no less) than it is with consenting adult homosexuality.

Public schools are used to spread all manner of ideas I'm sure you disapprove of. Evolution, sexual education, leftist indoctrination, etc...

But instead of rightfully condemning the inherently socialist and immoral institution of public schools, you instead use their existence as yet another reason to continue your persecution of homosexuals.

56 posted on 02/25/2002 12:54:01 PM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
If so, then why not just say so, and advaocate a position which discourages public sexuality (whether hetero or homo)?

That would be a valid statement and needs to be said. Many of the disorders that SADs display are also displayed by straights, and should be dealt with in the same way.

That said, when was the last time you saw a straight pride parade that was not rated 'G'?

You can't always disconnect what a man does in private with what he does in public. It's a character (sin) issue. That was the whole problem with President Bubba.

Shalom.

59 posted on 02/25/2002 1:06:37 PM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: OWK;Argee
You are correct in your post OWK. The reason I seem to pick on homosexuals more than heterosexuals is that the subject comes up most often. I also support arresting heterosexuals who perform in public places. I would also object to heterosexuals promoting multi partner sex in schools just as much as I oppose the homosexuals doing so.

You are also correct that I abhor socialist schools no matter what they are teaching in regard to social issues. Their mission to produce good little socialist workers for the state is detestable. The fact that they promote tolerance of all manor of perversion and criminal activity is also repulsive.

The squeaky wheel gets the grease and so, since the sodomites squeak loudest that just makes it appear that they are persecuted more. In fact they point the gun to their own heads and then squeal like pigs when when it happens. It would be very difficult to persecute those we know nothing about. The fact that they are such a loud noise draws the fire of their critics of which I am one. Heterosexuals do have a little more leeway given to them since their union is blessed by God. This is why some subtle displays of affection are tolerated in public. Holding hands and kissing are examples. Homosexuals on the other hand have no such blessing attached to their relationship. They cannot marry nor should they have public displays of affection.

60 posted on 02/25/2002 1:12:11 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson