Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Khepera
Once a determination is made that we where wrong then we accept that but, we must error on the side of safety when in doubt.

So it sounds like we are on a similar page. We are not more likely to ask for the arrest of a homosexual couple engaged in a deep kiss than a heterosexual couple. But, it is more destructive to the culture to allow a homosexual couple to kiss in public than a heterosexual couple. The heterosexual couple is demonstrating poor taste. The homosexual couple is demonstrating perversity that we don't ever want to mistake for normal.

Shalom.

237 posted on 03/01/2002 9:47:13 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: ArGee
We are not more likely to ask for the arrest of a homosexual couple engaged in a deep kiss than a heterosexual couple. But, it is more destructive to the culture to allow a homosexual couple to kiss in public than a heterosexual couple.

I notice that you only describe homosexual kiss as deep, not the hetero kiss.

Hmmmmmmm... That's odd and creepy.

240 posted on 03/01/2002 9:54:11 AM PST by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

To: ArGee; Khepera
So you would imprison (or maybe punish by citation, fine, etc.) any heterosexuals or homosexuals who engaged in a deep kiss in public?

If so, what is your definition of public? It's a very serious question, because I think someone suggesting punishment for public acts should make a distinction between public and private. Does a private act only occur when the two committing it are present? Could there be others around who consent to/agree with the act in question?

270 posted on 03/02/2002 4:59:44 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson