Posted on 02/21/2002 9:19:00 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
The National Transportation Safety Board doesn't expect to release a controversial videotape showing the Nov. 12 crash of American Airlines Flight 587 until at least this summer, an agency spokesman said Thursday, while declining to rule out the possibility that the recording corroborates eyewitness accounts that a midair explosion caused the crash.
In an exclusive interview with NewsMax.com, NTSB spokesman Ted Lopatkiewicz revealed that he'd personally viewed the critical video evidence, explaining, "I have seen it, yes."
He disputed a Jan. 27 report by Time Magazine claiming that the tape showed the doomed Airbus 300 as only "a tiny speck in the sky."
"When I eventually saw it myself," Lopatkiewicz said, "well - I wouldn't describe that as a speck. I mean, it's a lar - it's larger - although it's very hard to see. It's very grainy, very poor quality."
The second-by-second video was shot from a battery of traffic surveillance cameras stationed along Marine Parkway, a location approximately seven miles from JFK Airport, where Flt. 587 took off before crashing moments later.
The NTSB's Lopatkiewicz said Time also erred when, citing anonymous sources, it reported that the agency had recently obtained a second video that was shot from a much closer angle.
"No, there's just the one tape," he told NewsMax. "It just has several different cameras being used. The Time report was wrong. It's the same tape we got the very first week of the accident."
The NTSB spokesman said the tape shows the takeoff and crash of Flt. 587 from three different angles - two from toll booths on Marine Parkway and a third from an adjacent parking lot. The tape's sequence rotates from camera to camera, he explained.
But when asked directly whether the crucial videotape confirms what dozens of eyewitnesses say they saw - a midair fireball explosion near the juncture of the plane's wing and fuselage - Lopatkiewicz said he'd rather wait for the tape's release.
"I don't want to comment on that because I'd rather (have) everybody make his or her own assessment when they see it," he told NewsMax. "And it will be made public when we open the docket."
As to when that might be, the NTSB spokesman said:
"Were working on that. It's something that will be made part of our public docket when that docket is opened....I'm guessing - a wild guess - sometime this summer."
Lopatkiewicz explained that the JFK-Tower audiotapes of Flt. 587's crash made public yesterday were under the jurisdiction of the FAA, and that's why they were released before the videotape.
"Under our procedure once we are satisfied that we have a true transcript then we give the (audio)tape back to the FAA and then they release it under their procedures."
On the recording a pilot identified in FAA transcripts only as "Unknown" reports that he sees "an aircraft crashing," an observation apparently made while Flt. 587 was still in descent. Six seconds later the same pilot says the plane "just crashed."
"Affirm a fireball," the unidentified pilot adds five seconds later.
If there was nothing to hide, the tape would be playing right now on Fox, MSNBC, etc.
You are right. Wake turbulence does not cause explosions in commercial jte's fuselage. I know I'm going out on a limb here, but I think that a few ounces of C4 in the hollowed out sole of a shoe might, just might be able to produce such an event. Especially if the passenger wearing said device was sitting near the center of the plane where the main fuel tank is. I'm pretty sure that is where the "shoe-bomber" who was caught several weeks ago was sitting. Think about it (with or without the tin-foil hat), Why didn't he lock himself in the restroom and set off the bomb, where no one could have stopped him? Could it be that the restroom on most jets are not located close enough to the fuel tanks to guarantee the destruction of the plane? Planes can land safely if even a large hole is blasted away from the fuselage (remember the Aloha airlines incident several years ago), but they don't fly very well when several thousand pounds of jet fuel is ignited all at once.
We didn't hear any of that. Nothing really from the pilots. Pilots out there...Had it been turb, what would it have sounded like? A plane basically breaking apart and completely losing control doesn't happen so quickly that the pilots don't have a chance to say anything does it?
No, our government wouldn't lie to us, and if they did, well, it would be for our own good. [/sarcasm]
True, if I were the pilot on 587, calling the tower for help would be way down there on my list of things to do. There were a series of events that took place in the seconds before the plane impacted into that neighborhood. From what I have read about this crash, here are some of those events (these ARE NOT in any particular order of occurance):
The flight crew in the cockpit were heard on the CVR saying that they were experiencing turbulance.
The FDR recorded the rudder making several full-range motions with a veryu short period of time (seconds).
Witnesses on the ground saw an explosion on the right side of the plane, near where the wing connects to the fuselage.
The vertical stablizer seperated from the fuselage and fell into the water, where it was later recovered.
One of the engines crashes into the parking lot of a gas station.
Several other witnesses saw the plane on it's final descent, stating emphatically and with certainty, that the plane was on fire before it hit the ground.
The main points of contention seems to be (1)was there an explosion near the wing before the tail section seperated from the plane and (2) in what order did these events happen? Could the tail breaking free from the plane cause an explosion near the wing? In my opinion, it's not very likely. Could an explosion where the fuselage connects to the wing knock off one of the engines, and sever the hydrollic line controlling the vertical stablizer, causing the erratic movements recorded by the FDR? That seems more likely to me. That kind of movement may have been severe enough, when coupled with an explosion at the wing, to cause the tail section to break away from the plane.
The people who saw this happen in Queens were not likely to make up the explosion they claimed to see just to get attention because they already had all of the media attention they could ever imagine due to the large number of WTC victums that lived there. Too many things just don't add up. Add that to the NTSB refusing to release the tape that is in their posession and it starts to look like they are hiding something.
This must be karma coming back onme for making fun of the "dead-aliens-are-in-hanger-18" crowd a while back! :)
I didn't hear about this. That it I'm zipping the top shut now.
Couldn't we at least wait until they publish their report until we make that conclusion. I'm not sure it is a requirement or common practice for investigating agencies of any type to release bits and pieces of their investigation before publishing their report. To my knowledge, the NTSB has yet to say what caused FLT 587 to go down. They ought to log into FreeRepublic. They would discover "proof" of all kinds of reasons why the plane crashed.
I never said this was "proof." It's just that they were very quick to publicly rule out foul play/terrorism and lean toward a mechanical failure.
They've kept it under wraps fairly well until that Time story broke the silence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.