Skip to comments.
Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis
NewsMax ^
| 2/21/02
| Limbacher
Posted on 02/20/2002 4:21:45 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-310 next last
To: WillaJohns
Thanks for the nice comments on the show. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I'm willing to admit that I'm not favorable to every position taken by Pat. But I think the guy has had his character assasinated far beyond what was justified.
To: RLK
That is an awful thing to say. I hope you didn't mean it. If you do, I wish you hadn't said it here.
To: RJCogburn
Well, I'm not willing to stipulate that Larry Klayman would publish ALL the facts on his web site.
For instance, why is this case on appeal? Did he lose? Did it get thrown out?
Those are the things that would help people decide once and for all about Larry Klayman.
And you KNOW he knows that........but chose not to include it in his release.
83
posted on
02/20/2002 5:56:28 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I don't see ANY facts here regarding why they chose to do this; once I see them, maybe I'll be upset.
I just looked for ANY story about this on the wires and it's not there.
I am then left to presume NewsMax got this from JW; if you don't mind, I'd like to hear this from a NEWS SOURCE before I go crazy since Larry's releases tend to be unreliable and one-sided.
I'm sorry to join the thread so late.
Let's see, you have NewsMax, the "National Enquirer" of the right joined up with Larry Klayman, who never met a chance for a press release he didn't like.
With all that, who needs facts? Who needs corroboration? Who even cares if it's remotely true? Sounds like a sure-fire recipe for the "Bush-bashers" to come out in force. Unfortunately, they'll be joined by the dull-witted members of this forum who will believe ANYTHING they read without giving it a second thought.
Your plea for reason and clear thinking will be ignored and stomped on, as the hysteria runs wild.
Those of us that have been here for a while can just shake our heads and wonder what happened to our forum.
84
posted on
02/20/2002 5:56:38 PM PST
by
Cable225
To: Letitring
Of course he means it. He's been waiting for something to damn him to hell about.
Even something that is unsubstantiated.
85
posted on
02/20/2002 5:58:57 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Cable225
Well said. Those of us who haven't been here for years, wonder also.
To: Cable225
I was right. It came right off of Judicial Watch's web site; all NewsMax did was reword it.
87
posted on
02/20/2002 5:59:57 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
PT Barnum is once more affirmed.
To: Howlin
Why don't you call them or pop them an email. I bet they'd be happy to provide more information to you.
To: RLK
This is part of a persistent Bush pattern in which the Clintons have remained unconfronted. You're part of that crowd that thought they heard Bush say something about "Getting Clinton" as part of his platform.
You're always pi*ssed, RLK. I don't know why you even come on Free Republic.
I'll bet your grandkids are scared as hell of you.
90
posted on
02/20/2002 6:09:47 PM PST
by
sinkspur
To: Howlin
That is scarey. Reeks of hate.
To: Howlin
Amen to that. Klayman is no pansy when it comes to parsing words for the sake of a little publicity. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if Klayman didn't sue his own Mother one of these days just to keep his name in print. LOL. Oh, wait... he did that didn't he ? Gimme a break. NewsMax ? Yeah right.
92
posted on
02/20/2002 6:15:33 PM PST
by
Darlin'
To: Howlin
I agree with you here. I too want to know more. I think we're basicly in agreement but go about it differently. You're more quick to give Bush the break, and I've seen enough already to not dismiss this out of hand. I suspect before this is over I'll either come over to your side and join you, or vise versa. Later.
To: Howlin
No, I was not mocking you at all.
94
posted on
02/20/2002 6:16:49 PM PST
by
jla
To: DoughtyOne
I believe Bush is basically an honest person; I'm not saying PURE; as I said, I will wait to see WHY they are doing this.
And I am POSITIVE you will vote for Bush in 2004!
95
posted on
02/20/2002 6:21:52 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Samizdat
W.T.F. is going on??!!
96
posted on
02/20/2002 7:27:31 PM PST
by
timestax
To: timestax
Ask Howlin, it's just another smear job on the Bush Administration.
Comment #98 Removed by Moderator
Comment #99 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
Please cite case numbers, Judges names, hearing dates, etc., to support your allegations.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson