Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Linda Liberty
Once arrested, he's discredited, and the judge would never let him present whatever dirt he has, and moreover they could probably find a judge who'd let them hold this guy more or less incommunicado

Once a scientist working in a US government lab is arrested, the "dirt", as you say, is already out, i.e., the US has been working on weaponized anthrax which is a treaty violation.

41 posted on 02/19/2002 8:13:47 AM PST by Ada Coddington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Ada Coddington
Once a scientist working in a US government lab is arrested, the "dirt", as you say, is already out, i.e., the US has been working on weaponized anthrax which is a treaty violation.

One of us is badly confused. I'm under the impression that the government is making no bones whatever about having done research on bioweapons, and that news articles for months have reported that they suspect the source of the postal anthrax is a disgruntled US worker who learned about the technology in US labs. I also don't think there's any treaty violation implied. What treaty do you think would be violated and why?

134 posted on 02/20/2002 5:14:07 AM PST by Linda Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson