To: BJungNan
You wrote:
Don't be rediculas and don't assign positions to me that I do not hold and have not stated. Unless you found information in the story that I have not seen, it has not been determined in this thread that it was, as you say, statutory rape. Perhaps you are unaware of this, but having sex with a minor constitutes statutory rape...whether it was consensual or not. So yes, since the victim was 14, it has been determined that it was statutory rape.
To: PoorRider
Amen. I don't need to know every last detail of a case in order to render a fair judgement. I don't care if he was raped as a minor or his parents burned him with cigarettes. Underage is underage and you need to know better. Nothing indicates that this was consensual sex.
To: PoorRider
So yes, since the victim was 14, it has been determined that it was statutory rape. Now I stand corrected. And, I would say we have exhausted this thread. If anyone finds out what the actual cicumstances were, please let me know. All the Best!
87 posted on
02/21/2002 5:35:10 PM PST by
BJungNan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson