Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BJungNan
Apparently, there is some facet of statutory rape that you don't understand. I suppose you would like to blame all the children who repeatedly get molested by priests as well. After all, they didn't resist the multiple sexual advances.
72 posted on 02/21/2002 4:51:52 AM PST by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Lance Romance
Apparently, there is some facet of statutory rape that you don't understand. I suppose you would like to blame all the children who repeatedly get molested by priests as well. After all, they didn't resist the multiple sexual advances.

Don't be rediculas and don't assign positions to me that I do not hold and have not stated. Unless you found information in the story that I have not seen, it has not been determined in this thread that it was, as you say, statutory rape.

Stay on topic. We are trying to ascertain from the information provide - or another source if someone has it - what the circumstances of the rape were and then determine if the light sentence was appropriate. That is after all, the gist of the story, that the judge was "stupid" for handing down such a light sentence.

75 posted on 02/21/2002 7:56:38 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson